Browse
Platform
theVerifiedones

Verified production AI workflows, structured to help you compare, decide, and adapt.

Real implementations with tools, failures, numbers, and outcomes — before you choose how to automate.

Describe what you're trying to automate
Every workflow here is normalised across 40+ structured dimensions — steps, tools, scale, failures, outcomes — so they can be compared and synthesised. Not a list of cases, an execution dataset.
3500+
Verified workflows
150+
Tools tracked
40+
Dimensions each
15
Industries
Invoice processing · n8n + Claude API · 200/day · zero manual entry · Klarna AI · GPT-4 · 2.3M conversations · $40M profit improvement · GitHub Copilot · 55.8% faster coding · peer-reviewed MIT study · Legartis at Arvato · DPA review 45–60 min → under 10 min · Suki AI · 76% reduction in physician documentation time · JP Morgan COIN · 360,000 lawyer hours → seconds annually · Vodafone · n8n · £2.2M saved · 33 security workflows · Invoice processing · n8n + Claude API · 200/day · zero manual entry · Klarna AI · GPT-4 · 2.3M conversations · $40M profit improvement · GitHub Copilot · 55.8% faster coding · peer-reviewed MIT study · Legartis at Arvato · DPA review 45–60 min → under 10 min · Suki AI · 76% reduction in physician documentation time ·

Search the proof. Filter to your fit. Decide with a brief.

01

Search or browse

Start from a problem in plain words, or browse the catalogue by category, tool, or industry.

02

Filter to your fit

Narrow by stack, scale, evidence, and outcome until the results match your actual situation.

03

Decide with a brief

Read the grounded cases — tools, failures, numbers — and synthesise the best-fit approach.

Be present where decisions get made.

For companies
Find proven stacks.

Search by the problem you need to solve. Every entry includes what was tried first, the exact stack, and real numbers.

For builders
Log what you built.

Your verified workflows are your portfolio. Companies find you because you solved their exact problem.

For tool vendors
Confirm what's built on your tool.

When workflows cite your product, you'll be able to acknowledge the implementation and confirm it's supported — so buyers see your input on the evidence, never paid placement.

◆ Best-fit workflow brief · synthesis
What should you probably do?
A structured decision across your shortlisted implementations: best-fit approach, trade-offs, what fails at your scale, which direction to choose. Replaces the consultancy day — grounded in real execution, not opinions.
€2k+€149
per decision · launching soon

Your workflow is worth sharing.

Someone, right now, is about to spend €50k on a consultant to build what you built in a week. Put it in the catalogue.

All workflows

Browse by category

Implementers — opening soon

Find someone to build it.

Every implementer here will have signed in with LinkedIn and published verified workflows — that\'s the proof. No agency pitch deck. Just what they\'ve built and run in production.

Onboarding the first implementers now
The profiles below are illustrative — they show what real implementer cards will look like once verified builders start joining. Want to be one of the first?
Illustrative profiles · what your card will look like

Get found by companies that need your stack.

You built it. It worked. Now let the next company find you because of it. Your verified workflows are your portfolio — and they bring inbound leads passively.

  • Profile on every workflow matching your stack
  • Direct contact from companies ready to hire
  • €49/month flat — zero commission
  • LinkedIn verified — builds trust automatically
  • Works for solo devs and small agencies
1
2
3
4
Step 1 of 4
Step 1 of 4 — What kind of proof do you have?

Tell us who you are
and what you are sharing.

This determines the badge on your entry. Honest selection matters — your LinkedIn identity is attached to everything you publish.

🔨 Builder + Publisher
I ran this workflow
You built or implemented it — for your own company or for a client. First-person account. Highest trust badge.
📋 Third-party
I documented this case
You sourced it — from a press release, interview, or as the vendor publishing your customer's result. Publisher or vendor badge.
Representing a tool vendor and want to acknowledge an existing workflow?
For tool vendors

Your tool gets proven,
not just listed.

A practitioner saying 'this saved us €900/mo' is worth more than any ad. Partner status puts your brand on that moment.

73%
of seekers check verified workflows before starting a trial
4.2×
higher trial conversion from workflow-referred visitors
For tool vendors

Is your tool used by builders?

Verified workflows on this platform name the tools used at every step. If practitioners are building with your tool and publishing real production evidence — that's the strongest signal in the market.

Verified workflow presence
When a builder publishes a case using your tool, it becomes searchable by anyone evaluating that workflow pattern. That's not an ad — it's evidence. You can acknowledge it as actively supported by your team.
Stack intelligence data
Which industries use your tool. What it pairs with. Which workflow types it appears in. Volume signals by company size and region. Structured data from real production deployments — not surveys.
Reach buyers at decision time
People searching "how to automate invoice processing" are about to make a tooling decision. When your tool appears in the evidence they're reviewing — at that exact moment — it's different from any other marketing channel.
Acknowledgement, not sponsorship
We don't do paid placements that move cases up the page. Vendors can acknowledge a workflow using their tool — confirming it's a real implementation actively supported by their team. The signal sits on the case; it doesn't change ranking. Honest and credible.
How it appears to buyers

Buyers see your acknowledgement on the cases they're reading.

When buyers evaluate a workflow that uses your tool, they see your confirmation right next to the evidence — at the exact moment they're deciding.

On search results
Match Custom solution: n8n, ChatGPT
Invoice processing — email to ERP
Email inbox n8n Claude API
Best for:Finance teams processing 200–1000 invoices/month who want hands-off AP intake.
Why this matches
  • Real production deployment — n8n + Claude API stack
  • Outcome: 73% faster invoice processing
  • Verified: Implementation source · Named team
Source-backed Acknowledged by n8n Currently supported
On a workflow step
2
n8n
Orchestration
Extracts PDF, routes through pipeline, handles errors and retries.
Without acknowledgement
2
n8n
Orchestration
Extracts PDF, routes through pipeline, handles errors and retries.
Acknowledged by n8n Currently supported
With acknowledgement
◆ Acknowledged by vendor — you confirm the implementation is real and uses your tool correctly.
◆ Currently supported — you confirm the workflow pattern is actively supported by your current product.
Both badges appear free during your two-month trial. After the trial, they persist as long as your subscription is active.
Two months free

See which verified workflows use your tool. Acknowledge the ones you support. See what buyers in your category are searching for.

No auto-bill. At the end of two months, you choose whether to continue.

◆ Early-stage tools

Capabilities declared.
Customers wanted.

These startups have built the workflow — but haven't published a verified customer case yet. Browse by what you need. Request a pilot directly.

This is not the proven cases section. Entries here are capability claims by LinkedIn-verified founders — not confirmed by a paying customer. When a startup gets their first real case with numbers, it moves to the main catalogue as a verified workflow.
For AI startups

Built it. Need customers.

List your workflow capability where buyers actively look for proof. When your first customer publishes their results, you graduate to the proven cases — the highest trust placement on the platform.

Capability card in your category — seen by buyers searching for that workflow
Pilot request inbound — direct contact from interested companies
Teaser shown at bottom of matching proven-case category pages
Graduate to verified case when first customer publishes results
Access

Explore for free. Share for free. Go deeper when you need a decision.

In early access. The platform is free to explore and free to contribute. Paid help — the $20 Workflow Fit Check — appears only when you reach a decision moment.

Free
Explore

Browse real AI workflow patterns, tools seen in production, failure modes, and buyer fit signals.

Free
Share

Publish a workflow you built or used. Add tools, failures, numbers, and source links.

$20 introductory
Workflow Fit Check

Compare one workflow against your context and get a practical proof path before you buy or build.

  • Fit / mismatch analysis
  • Proof path
  • Risks and what usually fails
  • What not to build yet
Free during early access
Vendors

Claim your tool and acknowledge workflows that your product supports.

Vendor-confirmed is a label, not a ranking boost.

For teams, agencies, vendors with deeper needs, or partnerships — Contact us.

The proof layer for production AI workflows.

The V ones is a community proof space for AI workflows. We collect and structure real implementation evidence so buyers, builders, and operators can see what worked, what failed first, which tools were used, and what should be tested before scaling.

Why this exists

AI buyers now decide before vendors ever enter the room.

Most research does not start with a sales call. It starts with search, AI chatbots, review sites, peer examples, case studies, internal docs, and comparison tables. By the time a team speaks to a vendor, much of the decision has already happened.

At the same time, AI is easy to demo and hard to make work in production.

65%
of the B2B buying journey can happen before seller contact.
6sense 2025 B2B Buyer Experience Report
51%
of B2B software buyers now start research with AI chatbots more often than Google.
G2 Answer Economy / B2B Software Buying Research
50%
of GenAI projects were abandoned after proof of concept.
Gartner GenAI Project Failure Analysis
39%
of organizations report enterprise-level EBIT impact from AI.
McKinsey State of AI 2025
Our mission
◆ What we’re building

We’re fighting the chaos between AI promise and AI production. Every workflow published here is a brick in a shared foundation of institutional knowledge — verified by the people who built it, confirmed by the tools that powered it, and trusted by the companies that need to decide next.

What the V stands for

Verified, visible, and versioned.

01
Verified

Proof labels stay separate so the kind of evidence behind each workflow is always clear — source-backed, builder-submitted, peer-confirmed, vendor-confirmed, production-verified.

02
Visible

Workflow structure, tools, first failures, and reported outcomes made easy to compare across cases — not buried in prose.

03
Versioned

Each workflow improves over time as builders, peers, vendors, and production users add confirmation.

Who’s behind it
About the platform

The V ones is a proof layer for production AI workflows. Not another tool directory. Not a review site. Not an analyst report.

It collects and structures real AI implementation evidence: what was built, which tools were used, what failed first, what numbers were reported, and where the workflow may or may not fit next.

Existing AI libraries show what’s possible. Vendor pages show what their tools can do. The V ones focuses on the missing layer between inspiration and decision: comparable workflow proof.

It’s built for builders looking for patterns, decision-makers looking for clarity, and teams trying to move from AI promise to production reality.

Tools are everywhere. Proof is here.

DU
Built & maintained by
Dariusz Urbański
Founder · thevones.com
LinkedIn
◆ Add to the proof layer
Your workflow is worth sharing.

Someone right now is about to spend €50k on a consultant to build what you built in a week. Put it in the record — or search what others have already proven.

Legal

Terms of Service & Privacy Policy

Effective date: 1 May 2025  ·  TheVOnes.com  ·  Operated by Dariusz Urbański, Poland

1. What the V ones is

the V ones ("the Platform") is a community platform for publishing and verifying AI workflow case studies. Users publish workflows with their LinkedIn identity attached. The Platform does not create or endorse the content published by users.

2. Eligibility and accounts

You must be at least 18 years old to use the Platform. Authentication is via LinkedIn OAuth. By signing in, you represent that the LinkedIn account is yours and that the information in your profile is accurate. We may terminate accounts that impersonate other individuals or organisations.

3. Content standards — what you may publish

All published content must be accurate to the best of your knowledge. You must not publish:

We reserve the right to remove any content that violates these standards at our sole discretion, with or without notice.

4. Intellectual property

You retain ownership of content you publish. By publishing on the V ones, you grant us a non-exclusive, royalty-free, worldwide licence to display, distribute, and index your content for the operation of the Platform. We will not sell your content to third parties without your consent.

The TheVOnes name, V-mark badge design, and platform structure are the intellectual property of Dariusz Urbański. You may not replicate the badge system or impersonate the Platform.

5. Vendor accounts and verification

Vendor accounts require registration with a corporate email address matching the vendor's domain. Vendor verification of workflows is a commercial statement — vendors confirm that their tool was used as described. False vendor confirmations may result in account termination and removal of all associated badges.

6. Privacy and GDPR

We process the following personal data: your LinkedIn name, headline, profile URL, and avatar (received via OAuth). We use this data solely to display your identity on published content and to manage your account.

Legal basis: Legitimate interests (community platform operation) and performance of contract (account management).

Data retention: Your data is retained while your account is active. You may request deletion at any time by emailing privacy@thevones.com. Upon deletion, your published content will be anonymised (name replaced with "Anonymous builder") unless you request full removal.

Third-party processors: LinkedIn (OAuth authentication), Hetzner (hosting, EU data centres), Resend (transactional email). No data is sold or shared with advertising networks.

Your rights (GDPR): Right of access, rectification, erasure, restriction, portability, and to object. Contact privacy@thevones.com to exercise any right. You may also lodge a complaint with your national supervisory authority (in Poland: UODO).

7. Content removal and dispute

If you believe content on the Platform is inaccurate, defamatory, or infringes your intellectual property, contact legal@thevones.com with the URL, your relationship to the content, and the basis for removal. We will respond within 14 days. For urgent IP claims, we will remove content within 48 hours of a valid notice pending investigation.

We operate in accordance with the EU Digital Services Act (DSA). Our single point of contact for DSA purposes is legal@thevones.com.

8. Fake users and manipulation

We take verification integrity seriously. Actions that constitute manipulation include: creating multiple accounts to verify your own workflows, coordinating with others to publish false verifications, and using AI to generate fabricated case studies presented as real. Detection of these behaviours will result in permanent account termination and public flagging of affected entries.

8a. Automated access, scraping, and republication

The Platform's structured workflow data — including normalised case attributes, gap-analysis results, match scores, recommendation logic, vendor-acknowledgement records, and the structure that connects them — is the result of substantial editorial and engineering work. While individual case studies link to public sources, the normalisation, scoring, comparison, and synthesis layers are proprietary to the Platform.

You may not, without our prior written permission:

Linking to specific Platform URLs is permitted and encouraged. Quoting brief excerpts (a sentence or two) for review, journalism, or academic discussion with attribution is permitted under fair use. Wholesale republication is not.

For data licensing, research access, or partnership requests, contact legal@thevones.com.

8b. Paid briefs — licence terms

Paid briefs (basic, tailored, synthesis, sector reports, and team-licence outputs) are licensed, not sold. Each brief is a single-licence artefact issued to the purchasing user or their organisation. Each brief carries a watermark identifying its Brief ID, generation date, source, and where applicable the licensed recipient.

Permitted use: internal reference and decision-making within the licensed organisation; sharing the brief link or a copy with named colleagues, advisors, vendors, or auditors involved in the same decision; pasting the LLM prompt into your own AI tools.

Not permitted without separate written agreement: publication of a brief in whole or in part on the public web; redistribution to clients of an agency, consultancy, or platform without a team or enterprise licence; extracting brief content into a derivative dataset or training corpus; resale; removal of the watermark.

Team and Enterprise licences expand permitted use to all named seats and explicitly cover white-label client deliverables. See pricing for details.

9. Limitation of liability

The Platform is provided "as is". We do not guarantee the accuracy of user-published content. We are not liable for business decisions made based on information published on the Platform. Our aggregate liability to any user shall not exceed the amount paid by that user to the Platform in the 12 months preceding the claim.

6a. US Users — CCPA (California)

If you are a California resident, you have the right to know what personal data we collect, to request deletion, to opt out of sale (we do not sell personal data), and to non-discrimination for exercising these rights. To submit a CCPA request contact privacy@thevones.com. We will respond within 45 days.

6b. US Users — DMCA

We comply with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. If you believe content on the Platform infringes your copyright, send a DMCA notice to legal@thevones.com including: (i) identification of the copyrighted work; (ii) identification of the infringing material and its URL; (iii) your contact information; (iv) a statement of good faith belief; (v) a statement of accuracy under penalty of perjury; (vi) your signature. We will remove infringing content within 48 hours of a valid notice.

10. Governing law

EU/EEA and UK users: These terms are governed by Polish law. The EU Digital Services Act (DSA) applies to our operations. You may lodge complaints with your national supervisory authority. Mandatory consumer protections in your country of residence apply and are not displaced by these terms.

US users: For users in the United States, disputes shall be resolved by binding arbitration under JAMS rules, individually (no class actions), except for injunctive relief which may be sought in courts. If arbitration is unenforceable in your state, courts in Delaware shall have jurisdiction.

All other users: Disputes shall be subject to the jurisdiction of courts in Warsaw, Poland.

11. Changes to these terms

We will notify registered users of material changes by email at least 14 days before they take effect. Continued use of the Platform after that date constitutes acceptance.

Questions about these terms: legal@thevones.com  ·  Privacy requests: privacy@thevones.com  ·  DSA contact: legal@thevones.com
Vendor — claim your tool

Claim your tool.
Free for 60 days.

Get a Vendor verified badge on every workflow that uses your tool. Two minutes to submit, one work email, no billing. We review every claim manually within 24 hours — usually a quick chat to confirm you're the actual vendor. Once approved, your badge appears and 60 days of free grace begin while you decide whether founder pricing fits your team.

After the free period, vendors with an active founder subscription keep the full badge. Otherwise the badge transitions to a lighter "Vendor claim — verified" mark — still credible, less prominent. We'll always tell you a fair time before that switch.
Use the name as it appears in workflows on this site.
We'll send a 6-digit code. We use this only to verify ownership and notify you when the free period ends.
By claiming, you agree the tool name accurately represents your product.
Vendor portal

Your tool claim

Loading your portal…

Fetching your profile…
Implementer profile

Complete your profile

This is what companies see when they search for someone to build a workflow you know how to ship. Be specific — vague profiles get skipped.

DU
Your name
From your LinkedIn profile
✓ Account active
One line. Shown on every workflow card matching your stack.
Add the tools you have shipped real workflows with. Comma-separated.
Where pilot requests reach you. Different from billing email if needed.
2–3 sentences. What you have built. What you would not build. Whom you serve best.
Daily contact cap: a maximum of 5 inbound contact requests per company per day are forwarded to your email. The rest are queued and delivered the next day to protect your inbox.
Vendor dashboard

Your tool · vendor account

Acknowledge correct implementations of your tool, contact builders, and surface on every matching workflow.

N8
Tool name
Growth partner · €699/mo
✓ Account active
Workflows using your tool
Acknowledgements made
0
Workflow views (30d)
Available once analytics live
Public contact
Your email receives builder inquiries — capped at 5/day per builder to prevent spam. Higher volume? Talk to us about routing options.
Workflows you can acknowledge
Each workflow using your tool can carry your acknowledgement. Adds the ✓ Vendor acknowledged badge.
Sample output · Single-case brief · €49

Tailored implementation brief

Invoice processing — email inbox to ERP  ·  Adapted for your context
Your context
FinTech · 150 invoices/week · No-code ops team · EU
Source case
n8n + Claude API · 200/week · 8 months live
Fit assessment
Your volume (150/week) is within the validated range of this case (200/week). Fits without modification.
No-code ops team can operate n8n. This case was built and maintained by a non-engineering team.
EU context: Claude API (Anthropic) processes on US infrastructure. GDPR-compliant data processing agreement available. Invoice data is business data, not personal data in most EU interpretations — confirm with your DPO.
Gaps at your scale
Invoice format mix
This case processes PDF only. If you receive scanned images or XML/EDI formats, add a pre-normalisation step before the Claude API extraction. n8n has native OCR nodes for scanned images.
ERP integration
The source case uses a generic ERP API. If you use Xero, there is a native n8n Xero integration — no custom code needed. Quickbooks and NetSuite are also natively supported.
FinTech regulatory
Financial services firms should maintain a full audit trail per invoice. The source case stores raw PDF + structured output in Postgres. This is sufficient — confirm with compliance before going straight-through on invoices above your approval threshold.
Failure modes that apply to your context
Non-standard invoice layouts will break rules-based extraction
Applies to you: FinTech companies often receive invoices from diverse global vendors. Use Claude API extraction from day one, not a rules engine. Test across 50 real invoices from your actual vendor base before going live.
Strict coding rules → 40% exception rate on first deployment
Applies to you: At 150/week this means ~60 manual reviews per week if you go straight-through too early. Run a 4-week human-review period first. Your exception rate should drop to under 5% before removing human oversight.
Missing PO reference — not applicable to your context
FinTech ops teams typically control the purchase order process. This failure mode is more common in manufacturing and logistics.
Recommended stack for your context
n8n self-hosted Claude API Postgres (dedup + audit) Xero native integration
Setup time
2–3 days
no-code team
Running cost
~€35/mo
at 150/week
Time to ROI
< 2 weeks
vs current manual
What to validate before going live
1Run 50 real invoices through Claude API manually — measure extraction accuracy on your actual vendor formats before building anything.
2Map your GL codes and cost centres before building the Xero write step — this is the most common source of rework.
3Build the exception queue and human review interface before going straight-through. Run both in parallel for 4 weeks minimum.
4Confirm audit trail format with your compliance team before launch — store raw PDF + structured JSON + extraction confidence score per invoice.
Get a brief tailored to your actual context
This sample used generic FinTech assumptions. Your brief uses your real inputs.
Sample output · Best-fit synthesis brief · €149

Best-fit synthesis brief

Query: "invoice processing automation for FinTech, 150/week, no-code team"
4 matched production implementations · Analysed 18 May 2026
Best-fit recommendation
Build a custom n8n + LLM extraction pipeline. Do not buy a purpose-built AP tool at your current volume.
3 of 4 matched cases at 50–500 invoices/week use this pattern. Purpose-built tools (Vic.ai, Rossum) show better straight-through rates at scale but are economically justified only above ~1,000/week. At 150/week, custom pipeline ROI is 3–4× better.
Confidence: High 3 of 4 cases agree Validated at your volume
How the 4 matched cases compare
Case Volume Stack Outcome Team
n8n + Claude API ★ 200/week n8n · Claude · ERP API 4 hrs/day saved · €900/mo replaced No-code
Vic.ai enterprise 2,000+/week Vic.ai · ERP 85–90% straight-through AP team
AI bookkeeping varies n8n · Bank feeds 90% data entry cut No-code
Pretto mortgage pipeline Zapier · CRM · Bank APIs Manual coord eliminated Mixed
★ Best-fit for your context
Key trade-off you need to decide
✓ Recommended Custom pipeline
n8n + Claude API. More setup work upfront, but lower monthly cost, more control, no vendor dependency.
Cost at 150/week: ~€35/mo
Setup: 2–3 days
Purpose-built AP tool
Vic.ai or Rossum. Higher straight-through rate at scale, but expensive and overkill at 150/week.
Cost at 150/week: €300–800/mo
Consider if you grow past 1,000/week
Failure modes relevant to your context (3 of 5 total)
Non-standard layouts: Use LLM extraction from day one. Seen in 3 of 4 cases as the most common first failure.
Coding rules too strict: At 150/week, a 40% exception rate = 60 manual reviews/week. Budget 4-week learning period.
FinTech audit trail: Store raw input + structured output + confidence score. Confirm format with compliance before straight-through.
Recommended implementation sequence
Week 1Test Claude API extraction on 50 real invoices. Measure accuracy. Map GL codes. No automation yet.
Week 2–3Build n8n pipeline with exception queue + human review. Run automated and manual in parallel.
Week 4–6Track exception rate. If below 8%, start reducing human review. Confirm audit trail with compliance.
Week 8+Full straight-through above 90% confidence threshold. Exception queue handles the rest. Review monthly.
Get a synthesis brief for your actual decision
One workflow problem. Real production evidence. Clearer direction before choosing tools.
Brief ID
Saved in your browser. Copy the link above to return to this brief.